Skip to Content

August 2009

Canada's Eldorado agrees to buy rest of Sino Gold (AP)

VANCOUVER, British Columbia – Canada's Eldorado Gold Corp. said Wednesday it has agreed to swap about $1.8 billion in stock for all remaining shares of Australia's Sino Gold Mining Ltd., one of the largest gold mining groups in China.
Eldorado said the deal has the unanimous support of Sino Gold's board, and would allow it to complete the takeover of Sino Gold begun in June when it acquired a 20 percent stake in the company from Gold Fields Ltd. in Johannesburg.
Eldorado Chief Executive Paul Wright said it makes the new Eldorado "the unequivocal leader among international gold producers operating in China."
He said while a number of companies have attempted to develop operations in China, only Eldorado and Sino Gold conduct material business in the country.
Sydney-based Sino Gold is the largest international gold explorer and miner in China, with an 82 per cent stake in the Jinfeng gold mine in southern China's Guizhou province, a mine that produced 151,000 ounces last year.
Vancouver-based Eldorado operates or is developing gold mines in Turkey, Greece, Brazil and China.
Under the all-stock deal, Sino Gold stockholders will receive 0.55 Eldorado shares for each share of Sino Gold that they own. The shares are worth 2 billion Canadian dollars ($1.8 billion).
Eldorado said the offer is a 21 percent premium to Sino Gold's closing share price on the Australian Stock Exchange Tuesday.
The deal, which is still subject to regulatory and court approval in Australia, is slated to close in December. Sino Gold shareholders also need to approve the transaction.
Eldorado said the deal would create a gold producer with combined market capitalization of 6.4 billion Canadian dollars ($5.5 billion).
Wright said China is a "very mining friendly country" that is "blessed" with geological potential, a supportive government and strong mining laws.
"Clearly this business combination has everything to do with China," he said.
"China remains relatively unexplored and the future of the Chinese gold industry remains very bright."
The combined company's headquarters will remain in Vancouver with a major office based in Sydney, Australia.
Jake Klein, president and CEO of Sino Gold, said the best value creating opportunity for its shareholders is as part of leading low-cost intermediate gold company.
"We believe that this merger with Eldorado gives our shareholders exposure to such a company on attractive terms," he said.
Eldorado Gold shares closed down 58 cents or nearly five percent to $11.38 Canadian on the Toronto Stock Exchange Wednesday. It has traded between $12.37 Canadian and $3.44 Canadian in the past 52 weeks.

Among fall's TV frosh, 10 new shows worth sampling (AP)

NEW YORK – In sizing up the new series on tap for fall, it's worth remembering that a new show usually premieres with its pilot episode. And a pilot isn't always representative of the series that will follow.
The pilot episode is a prototype, sample and sales tool whose primary mission is to win a place in the grid for its prospective series.
Then, when it airs, the pilot has another hurdle to clear. It must introduce the series to viewers in a way that induces them to watch the second episode.
Then and only then can the show find its rhythm and start being a series.
So judge the success of a pilot this way: Once you've seen it, does it make you want to come back and see more?
Among the broadcast networks' 21 fall series, here are 10 whose debut episodes just might whet your appetite for a second round:
• "Melrose Place" (CW, premieres Sept. 8). Here's romance, glamour, naughtiness, mystery and (of course) Spanish-modern architecture in trendy L.A. It's a smart-but-not-too-smart re-imagining of the original 1990s soap, with the apartment digs significantly posher than before. This revival could make a tired old term like "trendy" feel trendy again.
• "Glee" (Fox, Sept. 9). Maybe you already saw the pilot (which Fox first aired last spring and currently is putting online). A musical comedy about a struggling high school glee club, it was pitch-perfect. The series picks up Sept. 9 with the second episode. It, too, is quirky, tuneful, up-tempo fun.
• "Community" (NBC, Sept. 17). No disrespect meant to community colleges, but this one (Greendale Community College) is an ideal backwater for goof balls, schemers and slackers. Sharp writing and a classy ensemble (including Joel McHale, John Oliver and Chevy Chase) earn the very funny pilot an A-plus.
• "The Good Wife" (CBS, Sept. 22). Julianna Margulies has never been better as a wife and mother forced to pick up her long-dormant career as an attorney and return to work in a pressure-cooker law firm after her politician hubby, played by Chris Noth, lands himself in jail. There are a lot of human issues to sort out here — apart from the legal cases — and a splendid cast to do it.
• "Mercy" (NBC, Sept. 23). A skilled, outspoken nurse, Veronica Callahan is back at New Jersey's Mercy Hospital after a tour in Iraq, with more personal problems than when she left. "I don't need to talk to anybody about it," she tells her boss sarcastically. "You know why? Because, I'm on delicious Paxil." The Paxil's not working. But viewers, keep your fingers crossed that "Mercy" keeps on working as well as its pilot, where Taylor Schilling is terrific as its star.
• "Modern Family" (ABC, Sept. 23). A lively half-hour boasting interlocked tales of three disparate families and a full-to-bursting ensemble (including Ed O'Neill, Julie Bowen and Sofia Vergara). Can this ambitious comedy make the most of its rich resources, and stay as brisk and funny as the pilot? Here's hoping.
• "Cougar Town" (ABC, Sept. 23). Courteney Cox as a woman with cellulite?! This comedy about a 40-year-old divorced mom is both riotous and strangely true-to-life as it depicts youth obsession, and how the no-longer-quite-young grapple with it. Dicey material. But auspiciously enough, Bill Lawrence is a "Cougar Town" executive producer and writer. As mastermind of "Scrubs" he proved long ago he can find the familiar and funny in zaniness.
• "FlashForward" (ABC, Sept. 24). It happens to everyone on Earth, including all the characters who populate this eerie thriller: They black out for two minutes, during which they see visions of their future as they might (or might not) live it on a certain day next April. What's causing this? Will the visions come true? And, hey, isn't that "Family Guy" creator Seth MacFarlane in a cameo appearance? If you watch this episode, expect your future to include more episodes.
• "Brothers" (Fox, Sept. 25). The premise sounds like a sitcom at its most cliche: Two brothers (played by Michael Strahan and Daryl "Chill" Mitchell) who, in adulthood, squabble as they did when they were boys, plus their parents (Carl Weathers and CCH Pounder), all living under the same roof. The appeal of the pilot is its execution. It's fresh, relatable, engaging. And funny.
• "Trauma" (NBC, Sept. 28). Lots of action. Lots of blood. Lots of rescue. Lots of hanky-panky. The first-responder paramedics from San Francisco City Hospital are a trauma team who, in various ways, are themselves traumatized, both on and off the job. The pilot's pyrotechnics and Bay Area locations make it look great. But what makes the series worth a second look: the fiercely complicated characters played by Anastasia Griffith and Cliff Curtis, who soar above the show's formulaic melodrama.
___
EDITOR'S NOTE — Frazier Moore is a national television columnist for The Associated Press. He can be reached at fmoore(at)ap.org

Kennedy's legacy shapes Obama's path (Politico)

Through two years of wearying campaigning, defeats and victories, the cool, disciplined Sen. Barack Obama rarely was overcome by emotion. Once was on the eve of the election, when his grandmother died.
The other time, a close aide recalled, was when Sen. Ted Kennedy endorsed him.
Kennedy's endorsement may have won Obama the nomination. His legacy, health care legislation, has already shaped Obama's presidency, and Obama will deliver a eulogy at Kennedy's funeral Saturday. But it wasn't until the last minute, in late January 2008, that Kennedy decided to take sides at all - throwing himself into a hard-fought primary between two of his friends, Obama and then-Sen. Hillary Clinton.
When he did, it was without reservation. He addressed critics, declaring Obama ready to lead. And he invoked his family's legacy:
"The torch will be passed again to a new generation of Americans. The hope rises again. And the dream lives on," he said, as the future president sat on a tall stool on stage behind him at American University in Washington on Jan. 28, 2008.
"He was a monumental figure in the history of the campaign," David Axelrod, Obama's senior adviser, told POLITICO, saying that the weekend of Kennedy's endorsement "transformed the campaign."
"It was like being shot from a cannon," Axelrod said.
The day of the endorsement was, Obama told a Kennedy adviser at the time, the greatest day of his life, according to Dan Balz and Haynes Johnson's account of the campaign.
Kennedy, whose age never diminished his outsized political standing or his eye for up-and-coming talent, saw Obama dominate the 2004 Democratic National Convention in his hometown, Boston, and he may have seen a little of himself in the young celebrity senator.
"When [Obama] came to the Senate as a new young senator, he was in a certain way a little like Teddy was when he first came to the Senate. That is, that everybody already knew about him or thought they knew about him," longtime Kennedy adviser Bob Shrum told POLITICO. "So I don't think Kennedy was surprised at his eloquence, his intelligence, his grasp of issues. But it was kind of a habit with Teddy [to mentor promising young senators]. He spent time with him and got to know him well."
He also helped recruit Obama to his committee, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions panel, Shrum said.
Their relationship was not, however, entirely smooth. Even before Obama was elected to the Senate, he chafed at the humility required of a newcomer, and sometimes it showed.
"We've got to call up not just Republicans, but we've got to call up Ted Kennedy and say, 'Ted, you're getting a little old now, and you've been a fighter for us before. I don't know what's happening now,'" Obama told a union audience in 2003 - in a video that appeared on Huffington Post in December 2007 as Kennedy was considering an endorsement. "Ted, get some spine and stand up to the Republicans."
Kennedy, who had encouraged Obama's campaign but hadn't endorsed him, shrugged off the slight after the young senator called to address the comments. Kennedy spoke occasionally to Obama during the campaign to offer advice - who to talk to, what to look for - but no endorsement.
And he watched the campaign for the next month, torn between his old friends, the Clintons, and the promise of Obama.
It was, Kennedy aides said at the time, the Clintons' own allies who gave him the final push. The days surrounding the South Carolina primary Jan. 26 saw the contest become, for the first time, racially charged. Kennedy blamed Clinton's side, and blamed President Bill Clinton himself. The two men spoke and did little to repair the breach.
Another Democratic consultant close to Kennedy's circle suggested that Kennedy's political judgment may have affected his timing as much as the harsh words in South Carolina. Kennedy had intervened at crucial moments in 2000 and 2004 to back his preferred candidates for the Democratic nomination, and he knew the impact he could have in 2008. He timed his announcement for the lead-up to a national primary - Super Tuesday - where Obama was struggling to convince millions of voters who had barely heard of him that he was ready to be president.
"Sen. Kennedy had an acute understanding of the way politics works and a particularly good understanding of the nominating process," said the consultant, Tad Devine. "When Kennedy stepped in the way he did, he essentially credentialed Obama."

Clinton's camp watched the endorsement with dismay.

"It was tremendously important and played a pivotal role in the campaign -- as he has in politics and the Senate for decades," said Clinton's chief strategist, Mark Penn, who had once also polled for Kennedy.

Shrum, though, suggested that Kennedy's revulsion with the Clintons was the lesser part of his choice.

"He watched the campaign unfold, and I know that stuff has been written that it was an anti-Clinton move - it wasn't. He saw Obama as holding up the sense of hope and change, the possibility of a different America, touching the same kind of responsive chords that his brother did," Shrum said.

Obama learned of the coming endorsement on the Thursday before Saturday's South Carolina primary while crossing that state in his campaign's RV, Axelrod said.

Obama took the call alone in one of the vehicle's two sections, then came into the other where his staff gathered to hear the news.

"He said, 'We got Ted Kennedy,'" recalled Axelrod. Obama explained that the endorsement must be kept quiet and done exactly as Kennedy wanted it. But he understood its power.

"This is big," the candidate said.

"The president is not given to being overly buoyant," Axelrod recalled. "But he was plainly happy, not just because of the strategic value but because of who Kennedy was and what it meant."

The Kennedy weekend continued with an op-ed by John F. Kennedy's daughter, Caroline, in the Sunday New York Times. The headline: "A President Like My Father."

The family had decided to go all out, to make explicit a passing of its legacy to an outsider, after decades of searching for an heir inside the clan. On stage at American University that Monday with Caroline and his son, Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.), the senator, too, referred to passing the torch and echoed his famous 1980 Democratic National Convention promise that "the dream shall never die."

Obama told Axelrod after the event: "That was a very humbling experience."

But he wasn't just a symbolic figure. Kennedy engaged actively in the campaign, using his speech to rebut Clinton's central attack on Obama, that he wasn't ready.

"I know that he's ready to be president on Day One," Kennedy said, imploring his audience - in another veiled reference to Clinton's campaign - to "reject the counsels of doubt and calculation."

Then Kennedy traveled for Obama, heading to East L.A. to make his case to a Hispanic crowd, and cutting into Clinton's edge in big states where routs might have ended Obama's campaign.

Kennedy vanished from the trail in May when he was diagnosed with brain cancer, but, understanding his own symbolism and the size of the moment, dragged himself to the convention stage in Denver.

He had spent the previous night, sleepless, in the hospital, in agonizing pain from kidney stones.

"To go give the speech he had to tell them to lower the pain medication," Shrum said. "He was just absolutely determined to do it. I had a 30-second version of the speech prepared. He scoffed at that."

"'I'm not going to come to the Democratic convention to give a 30-second speech,'" Shrum recalled Kennedy saying.

Kennedy delivered the longer version, again invoking his own legacy.

"And this November, the torch will be passed again to a new generation of Americans, so with Barack Obama and for you and for me, our country will be committed to his cause. The work begins anew. The hope rises again. And the dream lives on," he said in Denver.

When Obama was inaugurated on a cold day in January, Kennedy insisted on being there and taking in the ceremony outside the Capitol.

"He was absolutely ebullient, talking about what a great day this was," recalled Axelrod, who talked to Kennedy shortly before the senator suffered a seizure at the luncheon that day. "He was like a proud father."

The burly, passionate youngest brother of a powerful family, and the cool, slim young candidate from nowhere made an odd couple, but Kennedy seemed to impart to Obama the emotion he was sometimes unable to project. When Kennedy fell ill, their relationship was often more symbolic, and emotional, than practical: Obama filled in for Kennedy at a commencement speech soon after his cancer diagnosis, and Kennedy, an aide, said, later asked for an autographed copy of the speech. Earlier this summer when he was at the Vatican, Obama carried a letter to the pope from Kennedy, a Roman Catholic.

Now, Kennedy's death will frame the central struggle of Obama's young presidency, the charge to drive health care legislation through the Senate. The loss of his vote and his deal-making prowess are a profound blow to the bill's prospects, but his allies hope his memory will carry it through.

"It may be that now that his absence casts such a long shadow to make it more possible to get a health bill," said Shrum.

Read More Stories from POLITICO'Problem by problem,' Kennedy transformed himselfMorning showsPols eye once-in-a-generation openingTribute: Edward M. Kennedy'Never forget you saw this man'

STIMULUS WATCH: GOP opposes plan then seeks money (AP)

WASHINGTON – Georgia's Republican senators, Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson, voted against the $787 billion economic stimulus package, blasting the bill as a bloated government giveaway.
But their disdain didn't stop them from later asking Defense Secretary Robert Gates to steer $50 million in stimulus money to a constituent's bio-energy project.
Gates didn't do it, but Chambliss, Isakson and other Republican opponents of the stimulus aren't going empty-handed.
Billions of dollars worth of Defense Department stimulus money is paying for repairs and construction at military installations in areas represented by lawmakers who said "no" to the legislation, according to an analysis by The Associated Press.
The request from Chambliss and Isakson isn't the only one Gates and other top defense officials received before and after President Barack Obama signed the stimulus law in February. Their pitch stands out, though, because of the GOP's staunch opposition.
As Congress considered the legislation earlier this year, Republicans called it a partisan bill bound to make the size of government grow, not the economy. Not a single House Republican voted in favor of the bill; only three Senate Republicans did so.
Trashing the stimulus and also welcoming the money is a sore point for Democrats who say the GOP can't have it both ways. But Republicans say there's no inconsistency in opposing wasteful spending while also backing worthwhile projects.
The Pentagon is staying out of the fight. Navy Cmdr. Darryn James, a Pentagon spokesman, said political considerations were not a factor as defense officials put together the department's stimulus spending plan. The two main criteria were that projects could be started quickly to boost the economy and would also improve the quality of life for military personnel.
In statements, Chambliss and Isakson said helping their constituents is an important part of their jobs. In this case, it was Bell BioEnergy of Tifton, Ga., which is developing a process to convert waste into fuel.
Overall, Georgia is getting just over $200 million in defense stimulus money for work at installations that include the Army's Fort Stewart and Fort Gordon, and Moody Air Force Base.
Just a few days after criticizing the "staggering" cost of the stimulus, Rep. Brett Guthrie, a Republican from Kentucky, urged Gates to consider using stimulus money to renovate a military hospital at Fort Knox, a sprawling Army base located in his congressional district.
The Pentagon's stimulus spending plan shows no money for the hospital repairs. But of the more than $159 million in military stimulus money slated for Kentucky, almost $38 million is for other repair work at Fort Knox. Most of the total, $110 million, goes to Fort Campbell, home to the Army's 101st Airborne Division. It's in Republican Ed Whitfield's district.
Oklahoma Republican Mary Fallin joined her Democratic colleague, Rep. Dan Boren, in asking Army Secretary Pete Geren to use $8.4 million in stimulus money for repairs to buildings at two Oklahoma National Guard sites.
Fallin had called the stimulus a "Big Brother spending program" that didn't do enough to finance needed infrastructure projects. The money she and Boren sought isn't in the Pentagon's spending plans.
The Pentagon was allotted $7.4 billion in stimulus money, the bulk of it for overdue base repairs and new construction. About $5 billion is going to 16 states that top the Pentagon's stimulus spending list, including California, Texas, Florida, Virginia, Georgia and Kentucky, where the military has a significant presence.
About $1.2 billion is for new hospitals at Fort Hood, an Army base in Texas Republican John Carter's district, and Camp Pendleton, a Marine Corps base in California Republican Darrell Issa's district. The two hospitals are the largest individual projects to be paid for with defense stimulus dollars.
Carter voted against the bill, saying the stimulus would pile debt on future generations. But he hailed the $621 million hospital project as a victory for the economy in central Texas, where Fort Hood occupies more than 217,000 acres.
Construction of the Fort Hood hospital is scheduled to begin in September 2010. Also planned for the base is $100 million more in stimulus money for work ranging from road repairs to replacing heating and cooling systems.

John Stone, Carter's spokesman, said the congressman has been pushing for several years to get a new hospital at Fort Hood. The new hospital is also supported by Rep. Chet Edwards, a Texas Democrat who chairs the House subcommittee that controls military construction spending. Carter is also on the subcommittee.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is logging Republican names into a "Hypocrisy Hall of Fame," an online catalog of GOP lawmakers who voted against the stimulus package yet are "celebrating the benefits of President Obama's economic recovery bill in their districts."

One of the most recent names added to the Democratic list is Rep. Bill Young of Florida, whose congressional Web site contains a page with dozens of links to help Floridians "take advantage of federal stimulus money." Another is Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, a top House Republican who supports a high-speed rail project that's included in the bill.

Brad Dayspring, Cantor's spokesman, said the congressman has long backed the commercial rail project, which would connect Washington and Richmond, Va.

___

On the Net:

Defense Department Recovery Act: http://www.defenselink.mil/recovery/

Molina leads Giants past the Diamondbacks (AP)

SAN FRANCISCO – Pinch-hitter Bengie Molina hit a three-run home run in the eighth inning and the San Francisco Giants rallied for a 4-3 victory over the Arizona Diamondbacks on Wednesday night.
Juan Uribe also homered for the Giants, who won their second straight.
Ryan Roberts homered for the Diamondbacks, who lost for the ninth time in 10 games. Gerardo Parra had two hits and drive in a run.
Arizona starter Doug Davis took a four-hitter into the eighth inning. He recorded the first two outs before he walked Edgar Renteria and gave up a single to Randy Winn. Reliever Chad Qualls (2-2) came in and gave up Molina's third career pinch-hit homer.
Justin Miller (3-3) pitched the eight for the win. Brandon Medders earned his first save.
Davis gave up a pair of hits in the third and then retired 14 of the next 16 hitters before Uribe's homer. He walked four and struck out five.
Giants' starter Jonathan Sanchez went seven innings, allowing three runs and six hits. He walked two and struck out nine.
Roberts led off the game with a home run for the fifth time in his career. He hit an 0-2 pitch into the left field bleachers to give the Diamondbacks an early edge.
Sanchez retired 13 of 14 hitters from the second inning until Justin Upton, who was activated from the disabled list before the game, drew a one-out walk in the sixth.
Sanchez struck out Miguel Montero for the second out but walked Rusty Ryal ahead of Parra's second hit of the game. Alex Romero followed with another RBI single.
Parra entered the game with just two hits in his last 23 at-bats.
All seven of Uribe's hits against the Diamondbacks this year have been for extra bases.
NOTES: The Diamondbacks optioned left-hander Daniel Schlereth to Reno (PCL) to make room for Upton. ... C Chris Snyder was a late scratch from the Diamondbacks' starting lineup. ... The announced crowd of 27,645 is the fifth-lowest attended game at AT&T Park. ... Giants 1B Ryan Garko is hitting .300 (15-for-50) on the road since joining the Giants and is .121 (4-for-33) at home. ... Giants pitchers threw three wild pitches, their most since April 28.

Koreas near deal on family reunions at rare talks (Reuters)

SEOUL (Reuters) –
The rival Koreas neared a deal to resume reunions of families separated by the Korean War at a rare meeting on Wednesday that follows conciliatory moves made by the North after it was hit by sanctions, reports said.

The inter-Korean meeting held by Red Cross Societies in the North Korean resort of Mt. Kumgang is the first on humanitarian issues in about two years and comes after Pyongyang cut ties with Seoul in anger at the hardline policies of its president.

Analysts said the U.N. sanctions imposed on the North to punish it for carrying out a nuclear test in May could be squeezing its already depleted coffers and leading it to reach out to the South, once a major aid donor.

The two Koreas have proposed holding the reunions for the families split by the 1950-53 war in early October, but the two sides have proposed starting dates three days apart for the highly emotional gatherings, the South's Yonhap news agency reported government officials as saying.

The North suspended the reunions, which were last held about two years ago.

"The key issue on the agenda for this meeting is the reunion of separated families," South Korea's chief delegate to the talks, Kim Young-chel, told reporters before leaving Seoul.

Relations on the troubled peninsula turned chilly after President Lee Myung-bak took office in Seoul about 18 months ago. He halted unconditional handouts and linked resuming the South's largesse to the North ending its nuclear arms ambitions.

Lee had his first chance to tell North Korean officials of his policy face to face on Sunday, when he met a delegation that had flown to Seoul to mourn former President Kim Dae-jung, who was buried the same day.

North Korea has also released two U.S. journalists and a South Korean worker it had held in separate incidents, ended restrictions on border crossings and said it wanted to restore suspended tours for South Koreans to its state.

RISK DISCOUNT

But analysts and traders said the softening tone was still not enough to lift the risk discount that weighs on South Korean financial markets because of the security threat posed by a confrontational North.

"South Korea's geopolitical factor is still priced in, and the latest friendlier gestures by the North do not change that," Samsung Securities market analyst Hwang Keum-dan said.

"However, a softer approach by the North certainly comes as a positive development and should be an added help for market sentiment."

A U.S. official charged with enforcing U.N. sanctions on the North for its defiant missile and nuclear tests said the sanctions were having an impact, though it was still too early to gauge precisely.

"We've seen some indication that the overall effort is working," Philip Goldberg told reporters in Tokyo. "I don't want to say whether or not, or judge exactly how much and what kind of result we can expect at this point."

Just under 20,000 Koreans from both sides have taken part in the brief reunions of separated family members since the two Koreas tried to improve ties in 2000 after their first summit meetings since the war.

Hundreds of thousands of others still wait to hear through the Red Cross whether parents, siblings and children are alive on the other side of the world's most heavily militarized border.

South Korea has urged the North through the Red Cross talks to explain the whereabouts of more than 1,000 South Korean prisoners of war and civilians believed to be held in the North.

(Additional reporting by Jon Herskovitz, Jungyoun Park and Kim Yeon-hee in Seoul and Yoko Kubota in Tokyo; Editing by Jonathan Thatcher and Tim Pearce)

Health care industry contributes heavily to Blue Dogs (McClatchy Newspapers)

WASHINGTON — As the Obama administration and Democrats wrangled over the timing, shape and cost of health care overhaul efforts during the first half of the year, more than half the $1.1 million in campaign contributions the Democratic Party's Blue Dog Coalition received came from the pharmaceutical, health care and health insurance industries, according to watchdog organizations.

The amount outstrips contributions to other congressional political action committees during the same period, according to an analysis by the Center for Public Integrity , a nonprofit watchdog organization. The Blue Dogs, a group of fiscally conservative lawmakers, successfully delayed the vote on health care overhaul proposals until the fall.

"The business community realizes that (the Blue Dogs) are the linchpin and will become much more so as time goes on," former Mississippi congressman turned lobbyist Mike Parker told the organization's researchers.

On average, Blue Dog Democrats net $62,650 more from the health sector than other Democrats, while hospitals and nursing homes also favor them, giving, respectively, $5,680 and $5,550 more, according to the Center for Responsive Politics , a nonprofit organization that tracks the influence of money in politics.

The contributions came at a time when health care and pharmaceutical companies were mounting a campaign against a government-run public health insurance option, fearing cost controls and an impact on business. The Blue Dogs' windfall also came at a time when the 52-member coalition flexed its muscle with both the White House and the Democratic leadership in the House of Representatives as an increasingly influential bloc in the health care overhaul debate.

At the same time, many Blue Dogs were also rubbing shoulders with health care and insurance industry executives and their lobbyists at fundraising breakfasts and cocktail receptions that cost upward of $1,000 a plate, according to public information compiled by the nonprofit Sunlight Foundation , which advocates greater government transparency. Since 2008, more than half the Blue Dogs have either attended health care industry fundraising receptions or similar functions co-sponsored by lobbyists representing the health care and insurance industries.

In June, as Rep. Mike Ross , D- Ark. , who heads the coalition's task force on health care, publicly expressed the Blue Dogs' misgivings about the Democratic leadership's efforts, the former pharmacy owner was feted at a series of health care industry receptions. Ross has received nearly $1 million in campaign contributions from the insurance and health care industries over his five-term career, according to the Center for Responsive Politics . Calls to Ross' office weren't returned.

That month, the American Medical Association , which lobbies for health care providers and is one of the top contributors to Blue Dogs, came out against a public option.

House Republicans, however, tend to collect more than Democrats — including Blue Dogs — from insurers, health professionals and the broader health sector, the Center for Responsive Politics found.

Many of the Blue Dogs hail from districts that are conservative-leaning and have sizable numbers of Republican voters. According to the Sunlight Foundation , a nonpartisan think tank that focuses on government transparency, Blue Dogs often take positions that are favorable to the health care industry.

During the 2008 cycle, individual members of the Blue Dog Coalition raised a combined $6.24 million from the health sector. The average contribution to a Blue Dog Democrat in the 2008 election cycle was slightly higher — $122,370 — than the average contribution to a non-coalition Democratic lawmaker — $116,748 , according to the Sunlight Foundation .

During the spring, the Blue Dog Coalition , which got its name when former Rep. Pete Geren , a Texas Democrat, said moderates had been "choked blue" by "extreme" Democrats from the left, met with the Obama administration and House leadership to discuss concerns about the tone and direction of health care efforts.

The lawmakers, many of whom hail from the South and Midwest, pushed "rural health equity" with higher reimbursement rates for physicians and hospitals in areas of the country that struggle to recruit and retain health care providers.

The Blue Dogs were also very vocal in their subsequent complaints that House leadership wasn't including the group in the legislation drafting process. Earlier this year, 45 Blue Dogs sent a terse letter to the Democratic chairmen of the Education and Labor, Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees, stating that the group felt minimized in the process, which is "especially concerning in light of the collaborative approach being taken by our Senate colleagues."

The coalition also sent the Democratic House leadership a letter stressing they would favor a public option only if industry reforms and greater competition don't lead to lower costs.

ON THE WEB

The Sunlight Foundation's fundraising event database

Opensecrets.org's list of Blue Dogs and the total they've received from the employees and PACs of various health-related industries and the health sector overall since 1989

The Center for Public Integrity's chart of where the Blue Dog PAC gets its money from

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Rural lawmaker feels competing pressures in health debate

Health care 'town brawls' put Blue Dogs in a tough spot

Kentucky Democrat faces heat over health care, energy bill

Lawmakers heading home still divided on health care

Follow the latest politics news at McClatchy's Planet Washington

Lockerbie bomber sent home to Libya to die (Reuters)

EDINBURGH/TRIPOLI (Reuters) –
A former Libyan agent jailed for life for the 1988 Lockerbie bombing arrived home on Thursday after Scottish authorities released him on compassionate grounds because he is dying of cancer.

Abdel Basset al-Megrahi, believed to have less than three months to live, was released on the order of Scotland's justice minister despite strong opposition from the United States, which had campaigned to keep him in prison.

"He is a dying man, he is terminally ill," Scottish Justice Minister Kenny MacAskill told reporters in explanation. "My decision is that he returns home to die."

Hundreds of young Libyans gathered at the airport in Tripoli to welcome him, and cheered and waved national flags as his car sped out of the airport -- even though victims' relatives said they had understood there would be no hero's welcome.

Pan Am flight 103 was carrying 189 Americans when it left London for New York on December 21, 1988. In all, 259 people on board and 11 on the ground were killed when a bomb tore apart the aircraft and wreckage fell on the town of Lockerbie.

In a statement issued by his lawyer after his departure, Megrahi said he was innocent of the bombing, but also thanked the people of Scotland for setting him free.

"To those victims' relatives who can bear to hear me say this: They continue to have my sincere sympathy for the unimaginable loss that they have suffered," he said. "Those who bear me ill will, I do not return that to you.

"This horrible ordeal is not ended by my return to Libya. It may never end for me until I die. Perhaps the only liberation for me will be death."

U.S. REGRETS

The United States regretted his release.

"As we have expressed repeatedly to officials of the government of the United Kingdom and to Scottish authorities, we continue to believe that Megrahi should serve out his sentence in Scotland," the White House said in a statement.

Megrahi, 57, is the only person convicted of the bombing. He lost an appeal in 2002, though a review board ruled in 2007 that there might have been a miscarriage of justice..

A second appeal was withdrawn this week, opening the way for his release on compassionate grounds.

Relatives of many of the American victims thought Megrahi should have served his full life sentence in prison after being convicted of Britain's deadliest terrorist attack.

Frank Duggan, president of the Victims of Pan Am 103, a group that represents the families of U.S. victims, said he understood the Libyan government had promised that Megrahi would not "go back to a hero's welcome."

"There is going to be no dancing in the end-zone, as the expression goes," he told Reuters.

But in Tripoli, despite the fact that state media had not announced his return, hundreds were on the tarmac to cheer him as he emerged from his plane and embraced his waiting sons.

Many carried banners with the name of Libya's National Youth Association, which is close to Saif al Islam, one of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's sons.

One read: "You promised and you fulfilled the promise and you returned Abdel Basset al-Megrahi to his family."

Reporters were kept well back from events.

Megrahi got into a car bound for Tripoli's landmark Green Square, where he was expected to appear before thousands of people gathered to mark Libyan Youth Day.

While the relatives of many American victims were convinced of Megrahi's guilt, the families of many of the Britons killed have questioned the quality of the evidence used to convict him, and some have campaigned for his release to die back in Libya.

"I am delighted. I don't think he had anything to do with it and I think he was effectively framed," Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora died in the bombing, told Reuters.

IMPLICATIONS

While Megrahi's departure from Britain draws a line under an eight-year saga, the implications of his release for British-Libyan relations may be seen for years to come.

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi sees Megrahi's freedom as one of the rewards he has received from Western powers for giving up his nuclear ambitions in 2003, analysts say. The United States, Britain and other nations have normalized relations with Libya in recent years, and business with Libya has grown.

For Scotland, though, the Megrahi affair has been a millstone as it tried to balance American opposition to his release with the support of British companies looking for business deals with Tripoli.

Scotland has its own legal system and its government, led by the separatist Scottish National Party, has broad autonomy on justice matters.

The British oil company BP ended a 30-year absence from Libya in 2007 when it signed a bilateral deal for its biggest exploration commitment. Royal Dutch Shell also wants to tap Libya's reserves, the biggest in Africa.

Former British ambassador to Libya Oliver Miles played down the benefits to Britain and said the release was only one part of a long process of improving relations.

"It removes an irritant, but it wasn't a great irritant," he told Reuters. "I don't think it is going to give us lots of lovely new business."

(Additional reporting by Ali Shuaib and Salah Sarrar in Tripoli, Matt Spetalnick in Washington and Peter Griffiths and Luke Baker in London; editing by Kevin Liffey)

School Kids, Parents Should Get Flu Vaccines First (HealthDay)

THURSDAY, Aug. 20 (HealthDay News) -- The best way to stop the
spread of flu, be it the seasonal flu or swine flu, is to vaccinate those
most likely to spread the virus, namely school children and their parents,
new research suggests.

These recommendations run counter to those of the U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, which call for targeting those most likely
to develop complications from flu or die, say scientists at Clemson
University and Yale University School of Medicine.

"If there is a moderate amount of vaccine available, the ideal thing to
do is vaccinate schoolchildren and people their parent's age," said lead
researcher Jan Medlock, an assistant professor in the department of
mathematical sciences at Clemson. "This would then indirectly protect the
rest of the population.

"Stopping the transmission in schools would then keep the kids from
bringing it home to their parents, and keep their parents from giving it
to co-workers, grandparents, whatever," he added.

The big difference between these recommendations and those from the CDC
is that Medlock does not target children under 5. "Because they are not in
school, they are not actively spreading the disease, so vaccines aren't
being as well used as they could be used in another age group," he
said.

In addition, unlike the CDC's recommendations, Medlock's do not include
people over 50. "They can be better protected by stopping the transmission
among school kids," he said.

The report is published in the Aug. 20 online edition of
Science.

For the study, Medlock and Alison P. Galvani, an associate professor of
epidemiology at Yale, created a mathematical model of how flu is
transmitted that pinpoints the best strategy for distributing vaccines
among age groups that would minimize the spread of the virus.

They based their model on data from past flu pandemics, taking into
account deaths, infections, total years of life lost and economic costs.
By comparing a theoretical outbreak today with the flu epidemics in 1918
and 1957, they argue that a flu epidemic in the United States could be
stopped with about 63 million doses of vaccine.

This assumes that vaccines target children (aged 5 to 19), who are most
responsible for spreading flu, and adults (aged 30 to 39), who get flu
from their children. This strategy would help protect the remainder of the
population from infection, Medlock and Galvani say.

Moreover, the 63 million vaccine doses in the model are less than the
85 million doses given each year in the United States for seasonal flu,
they noted.

For seasonal flu, the CDC recommends that children aged 6 months to 19
get vaccinated as well as pregnant women, people 50 and older, people with
certain chronic medical conditions, people living in nursing homes and
other long-term care facilities, and people who live with or care for
those at high risk for complications from flu.

Right now, the CDC is considering recommendations for whom should be
vaccinated against the new H1N1 flu strain. Recommendations from the CDC's
expert panel suggest targeting pregnant women, children 6 months and older
and health-care workers first.

Dr. Marc Siegel, an associate professor of medicine at New York
University Langone Medical Center in New York City, doesn't think that
using historical data is a good method for predicting flu, but believes
the researchers drew the right conclusions about vaccine use
nevertheless.

"Their point is that children are super-spreaders, and adults are
secondary spreaders, and I really agree with that," Siegel said. "I think
their point about targeting spreaders and super-spreaders is right."

This use of vaccine builds what is called herd immunity, Siegel
explained. "The best way to protect people that are most vulnerable is to
vaccinate the spreaders," he said.

Another expert, Dr. Pascal James Imperato, distinguished service
professor and chair of the department of preventive medicine and community
health and director of the master of public health program at the State
University of New York Downstate Medical Center in New York City, says the
researchers correctly conclude that schoolchildren are often responsible
for the transmission of influenza.

But they also conclude that the parents of infected children serve as
bridges to spread the disease to others, Imperato said. "This latter
conclusion only holds true if the parents are not already immune to the
viral strain, either through vaccination or natural infection," he
said.

There are frequent changes in the influenza strains that predominate in
any given year, Imperato said. "Age-specific increased or decreased
susceptibility to a given strain of influenza virus very much depends on
the previous epidemiologic history of the strain," he noted.

"Annual age group-specific recommendations concerning vaccination
against influenza need to be made on the basis of the history of the
predominant strains of virus circulating," Imperato said. "As a result,
these recommendations may vary from year to year and cannot be based on a
statistical outcomes model that does not incorporate this and other very
significant variables."

More information

For more information on flu, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.

Lockerbie bomber freed, returns to cheers in Libya (AP)

TRIPOLI, Libya – The only man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing returned home Thursday to a cheering crowd after his release from a Scottish prison — an outrage to many relatives of the 270 people who perished when Pan Am Flight 103 exploded.
President Barack Obama said the Scottish decision to free terminally ill Abdel Baset al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds was a mistake and said he should be under house arrest. Obama warned Libya not to give him a hero's welcome.
Despite the warning, thousands of young men were on hand at a Tripoli airport where al-Megrahi's plane touched down. Some threw flower petals as he stepped from the plane. He wore a a dark suit and a burgundy tie and appeared visibly tired.
He was accompanied by Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi's son, Saif al-Islam Gadhafi, who was dressed in a traditional white robe and golden embroidered vest. The son pledged last year to bring al-Megrahi home and raised his hand victoriously to the crowd as he exited the plane. They then sped off in a convoy of white sedans.
International photographers and camera crews — along with most Libyan broadcast media — were barred from filming the arrival at the airport, which decades ago had been part of a U.S. air base.
Al-Megrahi's release disgusted many victims' relatives.
"You get that lump in your throat and you feel like you're going to throw up," said Norma Maslowski, of Haddonfield, New Jersey, whose 30-year-old daughter, Diane, died in the attack.
"This isn't about compassionate release. This is part of give-Gadhafi-what-he-wants-so-we-can-have-the-oil," said Susan Cohen, of Cape May Court House, New Jersey. Her 20-year-old daughter, Theodora, was killed.
At home, al-Megrahi, 57, is seen as an innocent scapegoat the West used to turn this African nation into a pariah. At the airport, some wore T-shirts with his picture and waved Libyan and miniature blue-and-white Scottish flags. Libyan songs blared in the background.
"It's a great day for us," 24-year-old Abdel-Aal Mansour said. "He belongs here, at home."
Moammar Gadhafi lobbied hard for the return of al-Megrahi, an issue which took on an added sense of urgency when al-Megrahi was diagnosed with prostate cancer last year. He was recently given only months to live.
The former Libyan intelligence officer was convicted in 2001 of taking part in the bombing on Dec. 21, 1988, and sentenced to life in prison for Britain's deadliest terrorist attack. The airliner exploded over Scotland and all 259 people aboard and 11 on the ground died when it crashed into the town of Lockerbie.
Al-Megrahi's conviction was largely based on the testimony of a shopkeeper who identified him as having bought a man's shirt in his store in Malta. Scraps of the garment were later found wrapped around a timing device discovered in the wreckage of the airliner. Critics of al-Megrahi's conviction question the reliability of the store owner's evidence.
He was sentenced to serve a minimum of 27 years in a Scottish prison. But a 2007 review of his case found grounds for an appeal, and many in Britain believe he is innocent. He served only eight years.
Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said although al-Megrahi had not shown compassion to his victims — many of whom were American college students flying home to New York for Christmas — MacAskill was motivated by Scottish values to show mercy.
"Some hurts can never heal, some scars can never fade," MacAskill said. "Those who have been bereaved cannot be expected to forget, let alone forgive ... However, Mr. al-Megrahi now faces a sentence imposed by a higher power."
He added that he had ruled out sending the bomber back to Libya under a prisoner-transfer agreement, saying the U.S. victims had been given assurances that al-Megrahi would serve out his sentence in Scotland.
"I don't understand how the Scots can show compassion," said Kara Weipz, of Mount Laurel, New Jersey. Her 20-year-old brother Richard Monetti was on board the doomed flight. "I don't show compassion for someone who showed no remorse."

As al-Megrahi's white van rolled down street outside Greenock Prison on his way to the airport in Glasgow, Scotland, some men on the roadside made obscene gestures. He later appeared on the airport tarmac dressed in a white tracksuit and baseball cap.

In a statement following his release, al-Megrahi stood by his insistence that he was wrongfully convicted.

"I say in the clearest possible terms, which I hope every person in every land will hear — all of this I have had to endure for something that I did not do," he said.

He also said he believed the truth behind the Lockerbie bombing may now never be known.

"I had most to gain and nothing to lose about the whole truth coming out — until my diagnosis of cancer," he said, referring to an appeal that he dropped in order to be freed. "To those victims' relatives who can bear to hear me say this, they continue to have my sincere sympathy for the unimaginable loss that they have suffered."

Gadhafi engineered a rapprochement with his former critics following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. He renounced terrorism, dismantled Libya's secret nuclear program, accepted his government's responsibility for the Lockerbie bombing and paid compensation to the victims' families.

Western energy companies — including Britain's BP PLC — have moved into Libya in an effort to tap the country's vast oil and gas wealth.

Briton Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora died on Flight 103, welcomed the Libyan's release, saying many questions remained about what led to the bomb that exploded in the cargo hold.

"I think he should be able to go straight home to his family and spend his last days there," Swire told the BBC. "I don't believe for a moment this man was involved in the way he was found to be involved."

Among the Lockerbie victims was John Mulroy, the AP's director of international communication, who died along with five members of his family.

____

Associated Press Writers Geoff Mulvihill in Mount Laurel, New Jersey, Shawn Marsh in Trenton, New Jersey, Meera Selva in London, Matthew Lee in Washington, Jessica M. Pasko in Albany, New York, and Jim Hannah in Dayton, Ohio, contributed to this report.